← Back to work

Healthcare Technology

iSono Health — Touchless Breast Cancer Screening UI

Eliminated direct hardware contact during scans, addressing infection-control protocols in clinical environments. [NEEDS INPUT: measurable outcome]

Designed a clinical application that enables doctors and imaging technicians to run breast cancer screening workflows touchlessly — reducing infection risk, physical strain, and cognitive load during scans.

ClientiSono Health
Role / ServicesUI/UX design, interaction design, workflow optimization
Category & YearHealthcare technology, medical device UX / 2024
ToolsFigma, Adobe Creative Suite
RoleUI/UX design, interaction design, workflow optimization
Timeline2024
Team[NEEDS INPUT: team size and composition]
Platform[NEEDS INPUT: platform]
What I owned[NEEDS INPUT: what I personally owned]
iSono Health — Touchless Breast Cancer Screening UI cover screenshot

Problem Statement

The challenge

The existing screening workflow required clinicians to physically interact with hardware and software controls during active scans — creating infection risk from repeated contact, ergonomic strain, and fragmented patient records that slowed follow-up care.

Methodology

How the work moved

01

Conducted in-depth interviews with radiologists, X-ray technicians, and clinic administrators to understand the moment-by-moment workflow during a screening session.

02

Designed gesture and voice interaction patterns for touchless scan control, allowing clinicians to navigate screens, capture images, and annotate findings without touching shared surfaces.

03

Centralized patient history, scan timelines, automated measurements, and follow-up action queues into a single dashboard — reducing the need to switch between systems mid-procedure.

Key Decisions

Decisions and tradeoffs

Designed gesture and voice interaction patterns for touchless scan control.

Alternatives considered
[NEEDS INPUT: alternatives considered]
Why I chose this
So clinicians could navigate screens, capture images, and annotate findings without touching shared surfaces during an active scan.
What I would do differently
[NEEDS INPUT: what I would do differently]

Centralised patient history, scan timelines, automated measurements, and follow-up queues into a single dashboard.

Alternatives considered
[NEEDS INPUT: alternatives considered]
Why I chose this
To reduce the need to switch between systems mid-procedure.
What I would do differently
[NEEDS INPUT: what I would do differently]

Results and Impact

What changed

Shortened average screening session duration through streamlined workflow and fewer context switches. [NEEDS INPUT: verified number]

Eliminated direct hardware contact during scans, directly addressing infection control protocols in clinical environments.

Received strong positive feedback from clinical testers for intuitive gesture controls and reduced physical fatigue during long scanning sessions.

Next Case Study

PPH/VHL Emergency Veterinarian Call Schedule System

Get in touch

Working on something complex?