← Back to work

Healthcare UX

CliniDocs — Enhancing Patient Management in Psychiatric Care

Cut documentation time per patient and improved record completeness across psychiatric consultations. [NEEDS INPUT: measurable outcome]

Redesigned patient management and psychiatric note-taking workflows for a clinical documentation platform — cutting administrative overhead and improving data accuracy for doctors and clinic staff.

ClientCliniDocs
Role / ServicesUI/UX design, clinical workflow research
Category & YearHealthcare application design / 2024
ToolsFigma, Adobe Creative Suite
RoleUI/UX design, clinical workflow research
Timeline2024
Team[NEEDS INPUT: team size and composition]
Platform[NEEDS INPUT: platform]
What I owned[NEEDS INPUT: what I personally owned]
CliniDocs — Enhancing Patient Management in Psychiatric Care cover screenshot

Problem Statement

The challenge

Clinicians using CliniDocs faced inefficient patient search, lengthy and repetitive documentation flows, and data entry patterns that didn't match the real sequence of a psychiatric consultation — causing incomplete records and wasted clinical time.

Methodology

How the work moved

01

Interviewed doctors, nurses, and administrative staff to understand how documentation was actually performed during and after consultations — revealing significant gaps between designed workflows and real use.

02

Redesigned the patient dashboard, search filters, intake forms, and psychiatric note templates to match clinical sequence and reduce redundant data entry.

03

Introduced consent prompts, privacy indicators, and structured note fields to improve data completeness and support compliance requirements.

Key Decisions

Decisions and tradeoffs

Restructured note templates to match the real clinical sequence rather than the existing form order.

Alternatives considered
[NEEDS INPUT: alternatives considered]
Why I chose this
Interviews revealed significant gaps between the designed workflow and how documentation was actually performed during and after consultations.
What I would do differently
[NEEDS INPUT: what I would do differently]

Introduced consent prompts, privacy indicators, and structured note fields.

Alternatives considered
[NEEDS INPUT: alternatives considered]
Why I chose this
To improve data completeness and support compliance requirements.
What I would do differently
[NEEDS INPUT: what I would do differently]

Results and Impact

What changed

Reduced average documentation time per patient by an estimated 35% based on staff feedback during testing.

Improved record completeness — fewer fields left blank per consultation compared to the prior system.

Staff reported being able to focus more of their attention on patients rather than screens during consultations.

Next Case Study

Scalable Atomic Design System for MSA Inc.

Get in touch

Working on something complex?